The Human Cost of AI Music: Artists, Jobs and Copyright
Behind every musician there are years of study, conservatory, rehearsals, travel, the cost of instruments and often sacrifices of health and family. AI-generated music threatens to take work away from exactly these people, and it learned from their own works to do so. Here are the verified figures and the rules that are changing.
How much work is at stake
In December 2024 CISAC, the worldwide confederation of authors' societies representing more than five million creators, published the first global economic study on generative AI. According to the study, by 2028 music creators risk losing 24% of their income, a total of about 10 billion euros over five years. Over the same period, the revenues of AI music companies could reach 4 billion euros a year.
The reason is simple. A generated track costs a few cents and a few seconds. A soundtrack, a jingle or background music for a shop, a video or an app, which used to give work to composers and musicians, can now be had almost for free.
Artists' works used without permission
The problem is not only competition. To learn to make music, generators were trained on existing recordings, and the authors of those recordings often gave no permission and received nothing.
- In 2024 the three major record labels (Universal, Sony and Warner) sued Suno and Udio, the two most widely used generators. At the end of 2025 Universal reached an agreement with Udio and Warner with Suno: the companies committed to using only licensed music. Other cases are still ongoing (as of October 2026).
- On 11 November 2025 the Munich Regional Court ruled in favour of GEMA, the German authors' society, against OpenAI: storing and reproducing protected song lyrics without a licence infringes copyright.
Many have noted a paradox: those who built the generators first used artists' works, then negotiated a licence once they ended up in court. Meanwhile, the artists watched their own works turn into a competitor.
Cloned voices
For a singer, the voice is identity and livelihood. AI can now imitate it convincingly. In 2023 the track "Heart on My Sleeve" imitated Drake and The Weeknd and was removed only after millions of plays. For a less famous artist, defending oneself is far harder.
What the law says
- Italy. Law 132/2025 on artificial intelligence, in force since 10 October 2025, grants copyright only to works that are the product of human creativity: if AI is used, the person's contribution must be creative and demonstrable. The same law punishes the unlawful spreading of deepfakes, meaning fake images, videos or voices that harm someone, with one to five years in prison.
- Europe. From 2 August 2026 the EU AI Act (Article 50) requires deepfakes to be disclosed and generated content to be identifiable, including by machines.
Why choose real artists
Choosing a flesh-and-blood musician is not nostalgia. It means valuing a person who has studied, who has prepared for that day, who looks the listeners in the eye and shapes the song to the moment. It also means supporting a craft that may disappear if nobody calls on it anymore.
At ceremonies this matters even more: a wedding, a funeral or a baptism happens only once. It needs someone who can read the moment, work with the priest and the organ, and pause when needed. We talk about live music in Live music and the sounds of nature.
This guide is curated by Maestro Ilarion, a tenor and pianist who sings live in churches all over Sicily. If you are planning a ceremony and want real music, sung by a person, see church wedding musicians and church funeral musicians.
The other pages in this guide
- AI music or human music: why stay human
- What is really inside AI-generated music
- Live music and the sounds of nature
- Sacred music, blasphemy and AI
Sources
- CISAC, 4 December 2024: global economic study on generative AI
- Forbes, 18 December 2025: the Suno and Udio licensing deals
- CMS Law: GEMA v OpenAI, Munich Regional Court ruling (11 November 2025)
- Whynow: "Heart on My Sleeve", the fake Drake and The Weeknd track removed in 2023
- Italian Law 132/2025 on artificial intelligence (in Italian)
- EU AI Act, Article 50: transparency obligations (from 2 August 2026)
- Deezer Newsroom, 21 July 2026: AI music exceeds 50% of daily uploads
What this story teaches
Behind a song there is always a life: study, effort, sacrifice. Choosing a real artist means giving value to that life.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AI music taking work away from musicians?
According to the 2024 CISAC study, by 2028 music creators risk losing 24% of their income, about 10 billion euros over five years. The jobs most at risk are jingles, background music and low-budget soundtracks.
What is CISAC?
It is the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers: it brings together the societies that protect authors' rights around the world and represents more than five million creators.
Are artists paid when AI learns from their works?
Often not. The most widely used generators were trained on existing music without asking the authors' permission. After lawsuits, some companies signed licensing deals with record labels, but individual musicians do not necessarily receive a share.
Who sued Suno and Udio?
In 2024 the three major record labels, Universal, Sony and Warner. At the end of 2025 Universal settled with Udio and Warner with Suno; other cases are still ongoing (as of October 2026).
What did the Munich court decide about OpenAI?
On 11 November 2025 the Munich Regional Court ruled in favour of GEMA, the German authors' society: OpenAI could not store and reproduce protected song lyrics without a licence and must pay damages.
In Italy, is a song made with AI protected by copyright?
Only if there is a real human contribution. Law 132/2025 protects works of human creativity even when made with the help of AI, provided the person's contribution is creative and demonstrable.
Is cloning a singer's voice a crime?
In Italy, Law 132/2025 punishes with one to five years in prison anyone who unlawfully spreads deepfake content, such as fake voices or videos, that harms a person.
What does the EU AI Act say about music?
From 2 August 2026, Article 50 requires deepfakes to be disclosed and AI-generated content, including audio, to be marked so that machines can recognise it.
Why does a live musician cost more than AI music?
Because behind it there is a person: years of study and conservatory, instruments, rehearsals, travel, being present on the day of the ceremony. Generated music is cheap because nobody is there living it.
Can AI music replace a singer in church?
No. In church, music accompanies prayer and the liturgy: it needs someone who follows the celebrant, adapts to the rhythm of the rite and sings with faith. We discuss this on the page on sacred music, blasphemy and AI.
How can I support real musicians?
Go to concerts, buy music directly from artists, choose live musicians for your ceremonies and be wary of playlists full of anonymous tracks.
Do platforms pay for AI-generated tracks?
It depends on the platform. Deezer excludes fully generated tracks from recommendations and editorial playlists; according to its data, in 2025 up to 85% of plays of these tracks were fraudulent.
Is AI always an enemy of musicians?
Not necessarily: it can be a tool, like a recorder or a notation program. The problem arises when it replaces the person, uses other people's works without permission or deceives listeners.
What should I ask whoever offers music for my event?
Ask who plays and sings, whether the music is performed live, whether the pieces are original or licensed, and whether AI-generated voices or backing tracks were used. A serious professional will answer without hesitation.